ARMANI Group reported revenue of €2.3 billion ($2.71 billion) last year, down 5% from the previous year, amid a global luxury slowdown and as a shift to casualwear reduced the appeal of its classic suits. However, filings by the Italian company show that figure nearly doubles to €4.25 billion with the inclusion of sales from beauty and eyewear — products made under license since 1988 by L’Oréal and EssilorLuxottica, respectively.
Giorgio Armani’s will, published last week following his death on September 4, named those two companies alongside French luxury giant LVMH as potential buyers of the business. Armani-branded perfumes and beauty products in L’Oréal’s portfolio generate around €1.5 billion annually, according to industry sources and analysts, while Armani eyewear contributes approximately €500 million to EssilorLuxottica.
Just over one-tenth of that goes to the Armani Group as royalties, according to Reuters calculations based on filings. Sales of licensed products could be a fundamental factor in determining the price of Armani in a potential transaction, according to an industry source who has worked at a possible suitor.
While operating profit for the Armani Group — which depends largely on fashion — shrank to 3% of net revenue last year, the beauty and eyewear businesses are potentially more lucrative. L’Oréal reported an overall operating profit margin of 20% last year, while EssilorLuxottica’s stood at nearly 17%.
Licenses central to potential sale – Armani’s license with EssilorLuxottica — in which the designer held a 2% stake — was renewed in 2023 for a 15-year term. The deal with L’Oréal runs until 2050. Aware of the importance of these collaborations, Giorgio Armani’s will states that priority for any sale should be given to groups with which his company “already has a partnership.”
EssilorLuxottica and L’Oréal said last week they would assess a possible investment in Armani, which they will initially hold as a 15% stake. A second, larger stake should be transferred later to the same buyer or a listing sought, the will says. And despite their long collaboration, Armani would be a tough nut to crack for EssilorLuxottica, which dipped into fashion by acquiring streetwear brand Supreme in 2024, but has emphasized its aim to become a med-tech group.
LVMH, controlled by French billionaire Bernard Arnault, said it was honored to be named as a potential partner. Maintaining control of the sizeable Armani license through a large stake purchase would be more significant for L’Oréal than for EssilorLuxottica.
A bid by L’Oréal for Armani may follow the precedent set by beauty group Estée Lauder, which purchased fashion label Tom Ford in 2022 — keeping the fragrances but granting long-term licenses to other players for apparel and eyewear. L’Oréal CEO Nicolas Hieronimus told Reuters in July that its “Stronger With You” fragrance was a “phenomenon” among younger men. Managing a fashion label in addition to beauty could add complexity for L’Oréal.
LVMH, with its depth and breadth of luxury expertise, would have the ability to manage a full acquisition that brings in-house the full suite of Armani’s sprawling businesses, several industry experts said. The French conglomerate could manage eyewear via its Thelios unit, while beauty is already a core business.
But LVMH may struggle to bring Armani beauty and eyewear in-house any time soon, given the existing long-running licenses. Boss Arnault would also have to cohabit with a foundation set up by Armani that will hold de facto veto powers.
Armani
More from NEWS
After BVLGARI, TAG Heuer CEO also exits, too! (LVMH Watches)
Following the departure of BVLGARI CEO Jean Christoph Babin (as of June 2026), TAG-Heuer CEO Antoine Pin is also exiting …
Soho House – MCR Hotels financing deal uncertain!
Soho House has secured the financing required to keep its $2.6b take-private deal on track after major investor MCR Hotels …
Bankrupt SAKS Global owes LVMH, Kering & Chanel over $220 million
SAKS Global Enterprises’ delayed payments to luxury brands played a key role in accelerating the retailer’s decline and pushing it …
